188体育

Date Published:
Jun 01, 1991
Focus Area(s):
Author(s):
Code:
WP 1991-13

The center of the county鈥檚 agrarian question is rooted in the skewed land distribution pattern. In addition, this particular agrarian structure is a legacy of our colonial experience and a product of the accumulated adverse effects of the palliative land reform measures implemented by the past governments. These are the arguments central to this paper that aims to present an analysis of the past and present agrarian reform programs. Is land reform a viable development policy? What conditions will ensure a feasible implementation of land reform? These are the questions this study attempts to shed light on.

Citations

This publication has been cited 19 times

In other Publications
  1. Adamopoulos, Tasso. 2010. . 2010 Meeting Papers 1145. Society for Economic Dynamics.
  2. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2014. . American Economic Review, 104, no. 6, 1667-1697. American Economic Association.
  3. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2014. . Working Papers tecipa-509. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  4. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2019. . Working Papers tecipa-637. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  5. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2014. . Working Papers tecipa-525. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  6. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2019. . Working Papers 25780. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  7. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2015. . Working Papers tecipa-540. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  8. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2012. . Meeting Papers 1083. Society for Economic Dynamics.
  9. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2020. . American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 12, no. 3, 1-39. American Economic Association.
  10. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2013. . Working Papers tecipa-480. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  11. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2011. . Working Papers tecipa-441. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  12. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2013. . Working Papers tecipa-494. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  13. Ballesteros, Marife and Alma dela Cruz. 2006. . Development Economics Working Papers 22613. East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
  14. Dela Cruz, Alma M. and Marife M. Ballesteros. 2006. . Discussion Papers DP 2006-21. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  15. Llanto, Gilberto M. and Marife M. Ballesteros. 2003. . Discussion Papers DP 2003-03. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  16. Otsuka, Keijiro. 2021. . Discussion Papers 2102. Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
  17. Plant R. 1993. . ILO Working Papers 992974533402676. International Labour Organization.
  18. Reyes, Celia M. 2002. . Philippine Journal of Development PJD, 29 ,No. 2. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  19. Reyes, Celia M. 2002. . Discussion Papers DP 2002-02. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.


Main Menu

Secondary Menu